Planets, candidates, and binaries from the CoRoT/Exoplanet programme: the CoRoT transit catalogue
M. Deleuil, S. Aigrain, C. Moutou, J. Cabrera, F. Bouchy, H.J. Deeg,, J.-M. Almenara, G. H\'ebrard, A. Santerne, R. Alonso, A.S. Bonomo, P., Bord\'e, Sz. Csizmadia, A. Erikson, M. Fridlund, D. Gandolfi, E. Guenther, T., Guillot, P. Guterman, S. Grziwa, A. Hatzes, A. L\'eger

TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive, homogeneous catalogue of transit-like features detected by CoRoT, including false alarms, binaries, and planet candidates, with analysis of their properties and occurrence rates, highlighting differences from Kepler findings.
Contribution
The study provides the first homogeneous, detailed catalogue of CoRoT transit detections, including false alarms, binaries, and planet candidates, with analysis of their characteristics and occurrence rates.
Findings
Identified 824 false alarms and 2269 eclipsing binaries in CoRoT data.
Detected 37 planets and brown dwarfs, plus 557 planet candidates.
Found discrepancies in planet occurrence rates compared to Kepler, especially for small planets.
Abstract
We provide the catalogue of all transit-like features, including false alarms, detected by the CoRoT exoplanet teams in the 177 454 light curves of the mission. All these detections have been re-analysed with the same softwares so that to ensure their homogeneous analysis. Although the vetting process involves some human evaluation, it also involves a simple binary flag system over basic tests: detection significance, presence of a secondary, difference between odd and even depths, colour dependence, V-shape transit, and duration of the transit. We also gathered the information from the large accompanying ground-based programme carried out on the planet candidates and checked how useful the flag system could have been at the vetting stage of the candidates. In total, we identified and separated 824 false alarms of various kind, 2269 eclipsing binaries among which 616 are contact…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
