Long Term Planetary Habitability and the Carbonate-Silicate Cycle
Andrew J. Rushby, Martin Johnson, Benjamin J.W. Mills, Andrew J., Watson, Mark W. Claire

TL;DR
This paper develops a biogeochemical model of the carbon cycle to assess how planetary size and insolation influence long-term habitability, emphasizing the importance of geochemical plausibility in habitability assessments.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive model integrating Earth's carbon cycle to evaluate habitability, considering planetary and stellar variations beyond climate models.
Findings
Larger planets exhibit greater surface temperature deviations due to topography and tectonics.
Temperature deviations up to 20 K for planets between 0.5 and 2 Earth radii.
Geochemical processes significantly impact habitability assessments.
Abstract
The potential habitability of an exoplanet is traditionally assessed by determining if its orbit falls within the circumstellar `habitable zone' of its star, defined as the distance at which water could be liquid on the surface of a planet (Kopparapu et al., 2013). Traditionally, these limits are determined by radiative-convective climate models, which are used to predict surface temperatures at user-specified levels of greenhouse gases. This approach ignores the vital question of the (bio)geochemical plausibility of the proposed chemical abundances. Carbon dioxide is the most important greenhouse gas in Earth's atmosphere in terms of regulating planetary temperature, with the long term concentration controlled by the balance between volcanic outgassing and the sequestration of CO2 via chemical weathering and sedimentation, as modulated by ocean chemistry, circulation and biological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
