Comment on "New General Relativistic Contribution to Mercury's Perihelion Advance"
J. Y. Zhou, Z. Li, Q. Li, X. Wang, Q. H. Liu

TL;DR
This paper critiques and refines a recent prediction of Mercury's perihelion precession, providing a more accurate estimate that significantly differs from the original claim.
Contribution
It offers a revised calculation of Mercury's precession rate, challenging the magnitude of the recently proposed relativistic contribution.
Findings
Revised Mercury precession rate is approximately 6.4×10⁻⁸ degrees per century.
The new estimate is about 30 times larger than the second-post-Newtonian contribution.
The calculated precession rate differs notably from the recent prediction by C. M. Will.
Abstract
C. M. Will in a recent Letter [arXiv:1802.05304] predicts a new Mercury's precession rate which is times larger than the second-post-Newtonian contribution, our calculation is about times larger. Thus the new Mercury's precession rate is about , instead of , degrees per century.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Planetary Science and Exploration · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
