Narrow vs. Broad line Seyfert 1 galaxies: X-ray, optical and mid-infrared AGN characteristics
Ma\v{s}a Laki\'cevi\'c, Luka \v{C}. Popovi\'c, Jelena, Kova\v{c}evi\'c-Doj\v{c}inovi\'c

TL;DR
This study compares narrow and broad line Seyfert 1 galaxies across multiple wavelengths, revealing differences in black hole mass, luminosities, and spectral trends that suggest NLS1s are younger, developing AGNs, while BLAGNs are more mature.
Contribution
It provides a multi-wavelength comparison of NLS1s and BLAGNs, highlighting spectral and evolutionary differences and proposing a developmental sequence.
Findings
BLAGNs have higher black hole masses and luminosities.
NLS1s show higher accretion rates and PAH contributions.
Spectral trends suggest NLS1s are younger, growing AGNs.
Abstract
We investigated narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLS1s) at optical, mid-infrared (MIR) and X-ray wavelengths, comparing them to the broad line active galactic nuclei (BLAGNs). We found that black hole mass, coronal line luminosities, X-ray hardness ratio and X-ray, optical and MIR luminosities are higher for the BLAGNs than for NLS1s, while policyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contribution and the accretion rates are higher for the NLS1s. Furthermore, we found some trends among spectral parameters that NLS1s have and BLAGNs do not have. The evolution of FWHM(H) with the luminosities of MIR and coronal lines, continuum luminosities, PAH contribution, H broad line luminosity, FWHM[O\,III] and EW(HNLR), are important trends found for NLS1s. That may contribute to the insight that NLS1s are developing AGNs, growing their black holes, while their luminosities and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
