Paths to Polarization: How Extreme Views, Miscommunication, and Random Chance Drive Opinion Dynamics
Matthew A. Turner, Paul E. Smaldino

TL;DR
This paper investigates how opinion polarization in social networks is influenced by initial opinions, communication noise, and network structure, revealing complex dependencies and measurement effects that impact polarization levels.
Contribution
It extends a previous opinion dynamics model to show polarization's sensitivity to initial conditions, randomness, and measurement methods, providing new insights into social polarization mechanisms.
Findings
Polarization is path dependent and sensitive to stochastic variation.
Initial opinion distribution significantly influences polarization outcomes.
Noisy communication can increase extremism and polarization.
Abstract
Understanding the social conditions that tend to increase or decrease polarization is important for many reasons. We study a network-structured agent-based model of opinion dynamics, extending a model previously introduced by Flache and Macy (2011), who found that polarization appeared to increased with the introduction of long-range ties but decrease with the number of salient opinions, which they called the population's "cultural complexity." We find the following. First, polarization is strongly path dependent and sensitive to stochastic variation. Second, polarization depends strongly on the initial distribution of opinions in the population. In the absence of extremists, polarization may be mitigated. Third, noisy communication can drive a population toward more extreme opinions and even cause acute polarization. Finally, the apparent reduction in polarization under increased…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
