Confounding caused by causal-effect covariability
Anders Ledberg

TL;DR
This paper explores how covariability in causal effects can cause confounding that standard adjustment methods cannot eliminate, impacting causal inference from observational data.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of causal-effect covariability within structural causal models and demonstrates its potential to cause unadjustable confounding.
Findings
Causal-effect covariability can lead to residual confounding after standard adjustments.
Structural causal models help explain how covariability affects confounding.
Evidence suggests this form of confounding is relevant in practical data analysis.
Abstract
Confounding seriously impairs our ability to learn about causal relations from observational data. Confounding can be defined as a statistical association between two variables due to inputs from a common source (the confounder). For example, if and , then and will be statistically dependent, even if there are no causal connections between the two. There are several approaches available to adjust for confounding, i.e. to remove, or reduce, the association between two variables due to the confounder. Common adjustment techniques include stratifying the analysis on the confounder, and including confounders as covariates in regression models. Most adjustments rely on the assumption that the causal effects of confounders, on different variables, do not co-vary. For example, if the causal effect of on and the causal effect of on …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
