Extended percolation analysis of the cosmic web

TL;DR

This paper introduces an extended percolation method to compare the geometrical properties of the cosmic web in observations and simulations, revealing significant differences in structure connectivity and distribution.

Contribution

The paper develops an extended percolation analysis technique and applies it to both simulated and observational data, highlighting differences in the cosmic web's structure.

Findings

Percolation functions are stable across different DM model box sizes.

Percolation thresholds depend strongly on smoothing length.

SDSS observations show only one large percolating void, unlike DM models.

Abstract

Aims. We develop an extended percolation method to allow the comparison of geometrical properties of the real cosmic web with the simulated dark matter web for an ensemble of over- and under-density systems. Methods. We scan density fields of dark matter (DM) model and SDSS observational samples, and find connected over- and underdensity regions in a large range of threshold densities. Lengths, filling factors and numbers of largest clusters and voids as functions of the threshold density are used as percolation functions. Results. We find that percolation functions of DM models of different box sizes are very similar to each other. This stability suggests that properties of the cosmic web, as found in the present paper, can be applied to the cosmic web as a whole. Percolation functions depend strongly on the smoothing length. At smoothing length 1 $h^{-1}$ Mpc the percolation threshold density for clusters is $\log P_C = 0.718 \pm 0.014$, and for voids is $\log P_V = -0.816 \pm 0.015$, very different from percolation thresholds for random samples, $\log P_0 = 0.00 \pm 0.02$. Conclusions. The extended percolation analysis is a versatile method to study various geometrical properties of the cosmic web in a wide range of parameters. Percolation functions of the SDSS sample are very different from percolation functions of DM model samples. The SDSS sample has only one large percolating void which fills almost the whole volume. The SDSS sample contains numerous small isolated clusters at low threshold densities, instead of one single percolating DM cluster. These differences are due to the tenuous dark matter web, present in model samples, but absent in real observational samples.