A Critical Review of the Lunar Laser Ranging
Andreas M\"arki

TL;DR
This paper reviews the history, methodology, and results of Lunar Laser Ranging experiments, comparing data from 1962 to 2007, and discusses the unexpected lack of signal amplification from retroreflectors.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of LLR experiments, including measurement principles, theoretical derivations, and analysis of historical data and anomalies.
Findings
Retroreflectors did not produce expected signal amplification.
Measured photon counts aligned with lunar surface scattering.
Retroreflectors may have degraded or measurements only captured lunar soil signals.
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) experiments. The measurement principle is explained and its theory is derived. Both contributions, the direct reflected light from retroreflectors as well as the scattered light from the lunar surface are considered. The measurement results from the Sixties until 2007 are then compared between different LLR stations and with the theoretical forecast. The very first experiment was in 1962: a laser beam was directed to the Moon and the scattered light from the lunar surface was detected. The number of received photons was in line with the theory. Then from 1969 the laser beams were directed to retroreflectors placed by Apollo astronauts and Luna space crafts. Retroreflectors are on the one hand reference points for long term measurements; on the other hand they deliver a much stronger return signal compared to the scattered…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
