The COS-AGN survey: Revealing the nature of circum-galactic gas around hosts of active galactic nuclei

TL;DR

This study investigates the circumgalactic medium around active galactic nuclei hosts, revealing that while metal ions are often undetected, Lyα shows high covering fractions, and differences in gas properties may be linked to galaxy history or environment.

Contribution

The paper provides the first detailed comparison of CGM properties around AGN hosts versus non-AGN galaxies, highlighting differences in Lyα and SiIII absorption at large impact parameters.

Findings

Lyα has a high covering fraction around AGN hosts.

Significant enhancements in Lyα and SiIII are observed at impact parameters >164 kpc.

No strong evidence of AGN ionization or outflows affecting the CGM.

Abstract

Active galactic nuclei (AGN) are thought to play a critical role in shaping galaxies, but their effect on the circumgalactic medium (CGM) is not well studied. We present results from the COS-AGN survey: 19 quasar sightlines that probe the CGM of 20 optically-selected AGN host galaxies with impact parameters $80 < \rho_{imp} < 300$ kpc. Absorption lines from a variety of species are measured and compared to a stellar mass and impact parameter matched sample of sightlines through non-AGN galaxies. Amongst the observed species in the COS-AGN sample (HI, CII, SiII, SiIII, CIV, SiIV, NV), only Ly$\alpha$ shows a high covering fraction ($94^{+6}_{-23}$% for rest-frame equivalent widths EW $> 124$ m\AA) whilst many of the metal ions are not detected in individual sightlines. A sightline-by-sightline comparison between COS-AGN and the control sample yields no significant difference in EW distribution. However, stacked spectra of the COS-AGN and control samples show significant (> 3 sigma) enhancements in the EW of both Ly$\alpha$ and SiIII at impact parameters $> 164$ kpc by a factor of $+0.45\pm0.05$ dex and $> +0.75$ dex respectively. The lack of detections of both high-ionization species near the AGN and strong kinematic offsets between the absorption systemic galaxy redshifts indicates that neither the AGN's ionization nor its outflows are the origin of these differences. Instead, we suggest the observed differences could result from either AGN hosts residing in haloes with intrinsically distinct gas properties, or that their CGM has been affected by a previous event, such as a starburst, which may also have fuelled the nuclear activity.