Conversations Gone Awry: Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failure
Justine Zhang, Jonathan P. Chang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil,, Lucas Dixon, Yiqing Hua, Nithum Thain, Dario Taraborelli

TL;DR
This paper proposes a method to predict early signs of conversational failure in online discussions by analyzing initial pragmatic cues, enabling timely intervention before antisocial behavior escalates.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework for capturing pragmatic devices at conversation start and demonstrates their effectiveness in predicting future antisocial behavior.
Findings
Early warning signs can be detected from initial pragmatic cues.
The framework shows promise for real-time intervention in online social systems.
Analysis of pragmatic devices correlates with conversation outcomes.
Abstract
One of the main challenges online social systems face is the prevalence of antisocial behavior, such as harassment and personal attacks. In this work, we introduce the task of predicting from the very start of a conversation whether it will get out of hand. As opposed to detecting undesirable behavior after the fact, this task aims to enable early, actionable prediction at a time when the conversation might still be salvaged. To this end, we develop a framework for capturing pragmatic devices---such as politeness strategies and rhetorical prompts---used to start a conversation, and analyze their relation to its future trajectory. Applying this framework in a controlled setting, we demonstrate the feasibility of detecting early warning signs of antisocial behavior in online discussions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Software Engineering Research
