
TL;DR
This paper analyzes the security of cryptocurrencies considering all costs and rewards, confirming that incentive gaps form early and can lead to centralization, with implications for future system design.
Contribution
It introduces the 'gap game' model to analyze when incentive gaps form, incorporating realistic expenses and rewards, and explores their impact on security and decentralization.
Findings
Gaps form before fees are the sole incentive.
Different miners choose different gap sizes.
Large coalitions reduce system decentralization.
Abstract
Blockchain-based cryptocurrencies secure a decentralized consensus protocol by incentives. The protocol participants, called miners, generate (mine) a series of blocks, each containing monetary transactions created by system users. As incentive for participation, miners receive newly minted currency and transaction fees paid by transaction creators. Blockchain bandwidth limits lead users to pay increasing fees in order to prioritize their transactions. However, most prior work focused on models where fees are negligible. In a notable exception, Carlsten et al. postulated in CCS'16 that if incentives come only from fees then a mining gap would form~--- miners would avoid mining when the available fees are insufficient. In this work, we analyze cryptocurrency security in realistic settings, taking into account all elements of expenses and rewards. To study when gaps form, we analyze the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
