How many qubits are needed for quantum computational supremacy?
Alexander M. Dalzell, Aram W. Harrow, Dax Enshan Koh, and Rolando L., La Placa

TL;DR
This paper refines quantum supremacy arguments by calculating the specific number of qubits needed for classical intractability, providing concrete thresholds for IQP, QAOA, and boson sampling circuits based on fine-grained complexity assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces fine-grained conjectures to precisely estimate the qubit counts required for quantum supremacy on current hardware.
Findings
IQP circuits with 208 qubits are intractable for classical simulation.
QAOA circuits with 420 qubits are intractable for classical simulation.
Boson sampling with 98 photons is intractable for classical simulation.
Abstract
Quantum computational supremacy arguments, which describe a way for a quantum computer to perform a task that cannot also be done by a classical computer, typically require some sort of computational assumption related to the limitations of classical computation. One common assumption is that the polynomial hierarchy (PH) does not collapse, a stronger version of the statement that P NP, which leads to the conclusion that any classical simulation of certain families of quantum circuits requires time scaling worse than any polynomial in the size of the circuits. However, the asymptotic nature of this conclusion prevents us from calculating exactly how many qubits these quantum circuits must have for their classical simulation to be intractable on modern classical supercomputers. We refine these quantum computational supremacy arguments and perform such a calculation by imposing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Low-power high-performance VLSI design · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
