Bell's theorem and Instantaneous influences at a distance
Karl Hess

TL;DR
This paper presents a model that simulates EPR experiments without requiring instantaneous influences, revealing logical inconsistencies in Bell's theorem assumptions and offering a way to circumvent them.
Contribution
It introduces a model that challenges the necessity of instantaneous influences in EPR experiments and critiques the topological assumptions underlying Bell's theorem.
Findings
The model simulates EPR experiments without nonlocal influences.
Identifies logical inconsistencies in Bell's theorem assumptions.
Circumvents the traditional Bell inequalities derivation.
Abstract
An explicit model-example is presented to simulate Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiments without invoking instantaneous influences at a distance. The model-example, together with the interpretation of past experiments by Kwiat and coworkers, uncovers logical inconsistencies in the application of Bell's theorem to actual EPR experiments. The inconsistencies originate from topological-combinatorial assumptions that are both necessary and sufficient to derive all Bell-type inequalities including those of Wigner-d'Espagnat and Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt. The model-example circumvents these inconsistencies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
