TL;DR
This study demonstrates that brightness variations in red-giant stars' light curves can be used to accurately infer stellar parameters like temperature and surface gravity, leveraging a data-driven autocorrelation model.
Contribution
It introduces a polynomial-based data-driven model of the autocorrelation function to predict stellar parameters from Kepler light curves, quantifying the information content in brightness variations.
Findings
Predicted $T_{eff}$ with <100 K accuracy.
Predicted $ m ext{log} g$ with <0.1 dex accuracy.
Recovered asteroseismic parameters $ m u_{max}$ and $ m riangle u$ with <15% precision.
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that the time variability of a star's brightness at different frequencies can be used to infer its surface gravity, radius, mass, and age. With large samples of light curves now available from Kepler and K2, and upcoming surveys like TESS, we wish to quantify the overall information content of this data and identify where the information resides. As a first look into this question we ask which stellar parameters we can predict from the brightness variations in red-giant stars data and to what precision, using a data-driven model. We demonstrate that the long-cadence (30-minute) Kepler light curves for 2000 red-giant stars can be used to predict their and . Our inference makes use of a data-driven model of a part of the autocorrelation function (ACF) of the light curve, where we posit a polynomial relationship between stellar parameters and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
