Capturing Complementarity in Set Functions by Going Beyond Submodularity/Subadditivity
Wei Chen, Shang-Hua Teng, Hanrui Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces new measures of complementarity in set functions, establishing hierarchies that better characterize near submodularity and subadditivity, with implications for approximation and auction efficiency.
Contribution
It defines supermodular width and superadditive width hierarchies, extending understanding of set function complementarity beyond existing frameworks.
Findings
SMW hierarchy is more expressive than SD hierarchy.
Approximation guarantees extend from SD to SMW hierarchy.
Almost tight lower bounds for auction PoA with respect to SAW hierarchy.
Abstract
We introduce two new "degree of complementarity" measures, which we refer to, respectively, as supermodular width and superadditive width. Both are formulated based on natural witnesses of complementarity. We show that both measures are robust by proving that they, respectively, characterize the gap of monotone set functions from being submodular and subadditive. Thus, they define two new hierarchies over monotone set functions, which we will refer to as Supermodular Width (SMW) hierarchy and Superadditive Width (SAW) hierarchy, with level 0 of the hierarchies resting exactly on submodular and subadditive functions, respectively. We present a comprehensive comparative analysis of the SMW hierarchy and the Supermodular Degree (SD) hierarchy, defined by Feige and Izsak. We prove that the SMW hierarchy is strictly more expressive than the SD hierarchy. We show that previous results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
