Late Bloomer Galaxies: Growing Up in Cosmic Autumn
Alan Dressler (1), Daniel D. Kelson (1), Louis E. Abramson (1,2) ((1), Carnegie Observatories, (2) Princeton University)

TL;DR
This study identifies and characterizes late bloomers—massive galaxies at z<1 that formed most of their stars recently—using improved star formation history methods, revealing they constitute about 20% of similar mass galaxies at z~0.6.
Contribution
The paper introduces a robust methodology for deriving galaxy star formation histories that effectively distinguishes late bloomers from old galaxies, and provides empirical estimates of their prevalence and properties.
Findings
Late bloomers make up ~20% of z~0.6 galaxies with Milky Way mass.
A subset of galaxies shows diverse morphology and environment, with mild environmental dependence.
Halo growth models are consistent with late galaxy assembly fractions.
Abstract
Late bloomers are massive () galaxies at that formed the majority of their stars within 2 Gyr of the epoch of observation. Our improved methodology for deriving star formation histories (SFHs) of galaxies at redshifts from the Carnegie-Spitzer-IMACS Survey includes confidence intervals that robustly distinguish late bloomers from "old" galaxies. We use simulated SFHs to test for "false positives" and contamination from old galaxies to demonstrate that the late bloomer population is not an artifact of our template modeling technique. We show that late bloomers account for 20% of galaxies with masses of the modern Milky Way, with a moderate dependence on mass. We take advantage of a 1% overlap of our sample with HST (CANDELS) imaging to construct a "gold standard" catalog of 74 galaxies with high-confidence SFHs, SEDs,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
