Reconfiguration of Satisfying Assignments and Subset Sums: Easy to Find, Hard to Connect
Jean Cardinal, Erik D. Demaine, David Eppstein, Robert A., Hearn, Andrew Winslow

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain simple-looking reconfiguration problems, involving transforming solutions while maintaining constraints, are computationally hard (PSPACE-complete), even when the problems are restricted to easy instances.
Contribution
The paper establishes PSPACE-completeness for several reconfiguration problems with simple constraints, highlighting their computational difficulty.
Findings
Reconfiguration of NAE 3-SAT assignments is PSPACE-complete.
Subset sum reconfiguration with limited element changes is PSPACE-complete.
Path finding in polytopes within the hypercube is PSPACE-complete.
Abstract
We consider the computational complexity of reconfiguration problems, in which one is given two combinatorial configurations satisfying some constraints, and is asked to transform one into the other using elementary transformations, while satisfying the constraints at all times. Such problems appear naturally in many contexts, such as model checking, motion planning, enumeration and sampling, and recreational mathematics. We provide hardness results for problems in this family, in which the constraints and operations are particularly simple. More precisely, we prove the PSPACE-completeness of the following decision problems: Given two satisfying assignments to a planar monotone instance of Not-All-Equal 3-SAT, can one assignment be transformed into the other by single variable `flips' (assignment changes), preserving satisfiability at every step? Given two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
