The TOP-SCOPE survey of PGCCs: PMO and SCUBA-2 observations of 64 PGCCs in the 2nd Galactic Quadrant
Chuan-Peng Zhang, Tie Liu, Jinghua Yuan, Patricio Sanhueza, Alessio, Traficante, Guang-Xing Li, Di Li, Ken'ichi Tatematsu, Ke Wang, Chang Won Lee,, Manash R. Samal, David Eden, Anthony Marston, Xiao-Lan Liu, Jian-Jun Zhou,, Pak Shing Li, Patrick M. Koch, Jin-Long Xu, Yuefang Wu

TL;DR
This study investigates 64 Planck Galactic Cold Clumps in the Milky Way's second quadrant using molecular line and continuum observations, revealing their properties and potential for low-mass star formation.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of PGCCs' physical properties and star formation potential, highlighting their low core formation efficiency and differences between clumps and cores.
Findings
Most PGCCs are low-mass star-forming candidates.
850 μm cores are more turbulent and dense than 13CO clumps.
The mass-size relation follows m∼r^{1.67}.
Abstract
In order to understand the initial conditions and early evolution of star formation in a wide range of Galactic environments, we carried out an investigation of 64 \textit{Planck} Galactic Cold Clumps (PGCCs) in the second quadrant of the Milky Way. Using the CO and CO lines, and 850\,m continuum observations, we investigated cloud fragmentation and evolution associated with star formation. We extracted 468 clumps and 117 cores from the CO line and 850\,m continuum maps, respectively. We make use of the Bayesian Distance Calculator and derived the distances of all 64 PGCCs. We found that in general, the mass-size plane follows a relation of . At a given scale, the masses of our objects are around 1/10 of that of typical Galactic massive star-forming regions. Analysis of the clump and core masses, virial parameters, densities,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
