When Names Are Not Commonly Known: Epistemic Logic with Assignments
Yanjing Wang, Jeremy Seligman

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new modal predicate logic that allows non-rigid agent names, enabling better modeling of knowledge distinctions, with a complete axiomatisation over S5 models.
Contribution
It presents a novel logic framework that relaxes the common knowledge assumption of agent names and provides a complete axiomatisation for it.
Findings
Logic handles de dicto and de re distinctions naturally
Provides a complete axiomatisation over S5 models
Enables modeling of non-common knowledge of agent names
Abstract
In standard epistemic logic, agent names are usually assumed to be common knowledge implicitly. This is unreasonable for various applications. Inspired by term modal logic and assignment operators in dynamic logic, we introduce a lightweight modal predicate logic where names can be non-rigid. The language can handle various de dicto and de re distinctions in a natural way. The main technical result is a complete axiomatisation of this logic over S5 models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Logic, programming, and type systems
