TL;DR
This paper extends a QR-based greedy algorithm for sensor placement to include cost constraints, demonstrating its effectiveness across diverse applications and highlighting the importance of preprocessing techniques.
Contribution
It introduces a cost-constrained extension of a greedy sensor placement algorithm and evaluates its performance on multiple real-world datasets.
Findings
The algorithm is scalable and identifies sparse sensors with near-optimal performance.
Cost-error landscapes vary by application and relate to underlying physics.
SVD-based preprocessing can be sub-optimal in this context.
Abstract
The problem of optimally placing sensors under a cost constraint arises naturally in the design of industrial and commercial products, as well as in scientific experiments. We consider a relaxation of the full optimization formulation of this problem and then extend a well-established QR-based greedy algorithm for the optimal sensor placement problem without cost constraints. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm on data sets related to facial recognition, climate science, and fluid mechanics. This algorithm is scalable and often identifies sparse sensors with near optimal reconstruction performance, while dramatically reducing the overall cost of the sensors. We find that the cost-error landscape varies by application, with intuitive connections to the underlying physics. Additionally, we include experiments for various pre-processing techniques and find that a popular…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
