Consideration of prior information in the inference for the upper bound earthquake magnitude
Mathias Raschke

TL;DR
This paper explores Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods, including new approaches, for estimating the maximum earthquake magnitude, emphasizing the role of prior information and addressing limitations of traditional Bayesian inference.
Contribution
It introduces two new estimation methods incorporating prior information and compares their performance with existing approaches through Monte Carlo simulations.
Findings
New methods reduce mean squared error with prior info
Existing methods face limitations in non-regular cases
Prior information improves estimation accuracy
Abstract
The upper bound earthquake magnitude (maximum possible magnitude) of a truncated Gutenberg-Richter relation is the right truncation point (right end-point) of a truncated exponential distribution and is important in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. It is frequently estimated by the Bayesian inference. This is a non-regular case and suffers some shortcomings in contrast to the Bayesian inference for the regular case of likelihood function. Here previous non-Bayesian inference methods are outlined and discussed as alternatives including, the formulation of the corresponding confidence distributions (confidence or credible interval). Furthermore, the consideration of prior information is extended to non-Bayesian estimation methods. In addition, two new estimation approaches with prior information are developed. The performances of previous and new estimation methods and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical and numerical algorithms · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Seismic Performance and Analysis
