A Framework for Prioritizing the TESS Planetary Candidates Most Amenable to Atmospheric Characterization
Eliza M.-R. Kempton, Jacob L. Bean, Dana R. Louie, Drake Deming,, Daniel D. B. Koll, Megan Mansfield, Jessie L. Christiansen, Mercedes, Lopez-Morales, Mark R. Swain, Robert T. Zellem, Sarah Ballard, Thomas, Barclay, Joanna K. Barstow, Natasha E. Batalha, Thomas G. Beatty, Zach

TL;DR
This paper introduces two simple metrics to identify the best TESS exoplanet candidates for atmospheric study, enabling rapid follow-up and maximizing scientific returns for current and future telescopes.
Contribution
It proposes straightforward analytic metrics to prioritize TESS exoplanets for atmospheric characterization, aiding efficient follow-up and mission planning.
Findings
Metrics effectively identify top atmospheric targets
Approximately 300 high-quality candidates can be selected
Metrics enable rapid follow-up prioritization
Abstract
A key legacy of the recently launched TESS mission will be to provide the astronomical community with many of the best transiting exoplanet targets for atmospheric characterization. However, time is of the essence to take full advantage of this opportunity. JWST, although delayed, will still complete its nominal five year mission on a timeline that motivates rapid identification, confirmation, and mass measurement of the top atmospheric characterization targets from TESS. Beyond JWST, future dedicated missions for atmospheric studies such as ARIEL require the discovery and confirmation of several hundred additional sub-Jovian size planets (R_p < 10 R_Earth) orbiting bright stars, beyond those known today, to ensure a successful statistical census of exoplanet atmospheres. Ground-based ELTs will also contribute to surveying the atmospheres of the transiting planets discovered by TESS.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
