On the Interpretation of Far-infrared Spectral Energy Distributions. I: The 850 $\mu$m Molecular Mass Estimator
G. C. Privon (University of Florida), D. Narayanan (University of, Florida, Cosmic DAWN Center), R. Dav\'e (Institute for Astronomy Royal, Observatory, University of the Western Cape, South African Astronomical, Observatory)

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological simulations and dust radiative transfer to evaluate the effectiveness of 850 μm luminosity as a molecular gas mass estimator across a wide redshift range, highlighting the impact of dust-to-gas ratios and metallicity.
Contribution
It demonstrates that empirical calibrations of 850 μm luminosity accurately estimate molecular gas mass in simulated galaxies and explores the effects of dust properties and metallicity variations.
Findings
Empirical L850-Mmol calibrations recover molecular gas mass accurately.
Scatter in the relation is mainly due to variations in gas-to-dust ratio.
Calibration remains valid for massive galaxies but deviates at low metallicity.
Abstract
We use a suite of cosmological zoom galaxy formation simulations and dust radiative transfer calculations to explore the use of the monochromatic luminosity (L) as a molecular gas mass (M) estimator in galaxies between for a broad range of masses. For our fiducial simulations, where we assume the dust mass is linearly related to the metal mass, we find that empirical L-M calibrations accurately recover the molecular gas mass of our model galaxies, and that the L-dependent calibration is preferred. We argue the major driver of scatter in the L-M relation arises from variations in the molecular gas to dust mass ratio, rather than variations in the dust temperature, in agreement with the previous study of Liang et al. Emulating a realistic measurement strategy with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
