Evidence for a systematic offset of -80 micro-arcseconds in the Gaia DR2 parallaxes
Keivan G. Stassun (1,2), Guillermo Torres (3) ((1) Vanderbilt, University, (2) Fisk University, (3) Harvard-Smithsonian Center for, Astrophysics)

TL;DR
This study confirms a systematic offset of approximately -80 micro-arcseconds in Gaia DR2 parallaxes, indicating Gaia parallaxes are slightly underestimated for certain brightness and distance ranges, with implications for astrometric measurements.
Contribution
The paper provides an independent verification of the Gaia DR2 parallax offset using eclipsing binary data, refining the understanding of Gaia's systematic errors.
Findings
Gaia DR2 parallaxes are systematically underestimated by about 80 micro-arcseconds.
The offset is consistent across distances up to 3 kpc, with slight increase beyond 1 kpc.
The systematic error is below 100 micro-arcseconds, aligning with expectations.
Abstract
We reprise the analysis of Stassun & Torres (2016), comparing the parallaxes of the eclipsing binaries reported in that paper to the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia second data release (DR2). We find evidence for a systematic offset of micro-arcseconds, in the sense of the Gaia parallaxes being too small, for brightnesses and for distances (0.03--3 kpc) in the ranges spanned by the eclipsing binary sample. The offset does not appear to depend strongly on distance within this range, though there is marginal evidence that the offset increases (becomes slightly more negative) for distances kpc, up to the 3 kpc distances probed by the test sample. The offset reported here is consistent with the expectation that global systematics in the Gaia DR2 parallaxes are below 100 micro-arcseconds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
