Garden-of-Eden states and fixed points of monotone dynamical systems
Ricky X. F. Chen, Henning S. Mortveit, Christian M. Reidys

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of Garden-of-Eden states and fixed points in monotone dynamical systems, revealing bounds on limit cycle sizes and distinctions between sequential and parallel systems.
Contribution
It characterizes GoE states and fixed points in monotone SDS, establishes bounds on limit cycle sizes, and shows that some monotone PDS cannot be represented as SDS.
Findings
Maximum limit cycle size is less than binomial coefficient
Identifies a set of states that are either GoE or reach fixed points
Monotone PDS cannot always be expressed as monotone SDS
Abstract
In this paper we analyze Garden-of-Eden (GoE) states and fixed points of monotone, sequential dynamical systems (SDS). For any monotone SDS and fixed update schedule, we identify a particular set of states, each state being either a GoE state or reaching a fixed point, while both determining if a state is a GoE state and finding out all fixed points are generally hard. As a result, we show that the maximum size of their limit cycles is strictly less than . We connect these results to the Knaster-Tarski theorem and the LYM inequality. Finally, we establish that there exist monotone, parallel dynamical systems (PDS) that cannot be expressed as monotone SDS, despite the fact that the converse is always true.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGene Regulatory Network Analysis · Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling · Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
