Randomness extraction from Bell violation with continuous parametric down conversion
Lijiong Shen, Jianwei Lee, Le Phuc Thinh, Jean-Daniel Bancal,, Alessandro Cer\`e, Antia Lamas-Linares, Adriana Lita, Thomas Gerrits, Sae Woo, Nam, Valerio Scarani, Christian Kurtsiefer

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a loophole-free Bell test using continuous parametric down conversion and superconducting detectors, achieving high violation of Bell inequality and generating a significant rate of certified private randomness.
Contribution
It introduces a method to violate Bell inequality without fair sampling assumption using continuous photon sources and high-efficiency detectors, enabling high-rate randomness generation.
Findings
Maximum Bell violation of S=2.01602(32) achieved.
Asymptotic randomness rate of ~1300 bits/sec calculated.
Generated 617,920 random bits in 43 minutes.
Abstract
We present a violation of the CHSH inequality without the fair sampling assumption with a continuously pumped photon pair source combined with two high efficiency superconducting detectors. Due to the continuous nature of the source, the choice of the duration of each measurement round effectively controls the average number of photon pairs participating in the Bell test. We observe a maximum violation of S= 2.01602(32) with average number of pairs per round of ~0.32, compatible with our system overall detection efficiencies. Systems that violate a Bell inequality are guaranteed to generate private randomness, with the randomness extraction rate depending on the observed violation and on the repetition rate of the Bell test. For our realization, the optimal rate of randomness generation is a compromise between the observed violation and the duration of each measurement round, with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
