Assimilated LVEF: A Bayesian technique combining human intuition with machine measurement for sharper estimates of left ventricular ejection fraction and stronger association with outcomes
Thomas McAndrew, Bjorn Redfors, Aaron Crowley, Yiran Zhang, Maria Alu,, Matthew Finn, Ariel Furer, Shmuel Chen, Geraldine Ong, Dan Burkhoff, Ori, Ben-Yehuda, Wael A. Jaber, Rebecca Hahn, Martin Leon

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian method that combines visual and machine-guided LVEF measurements to improve accuracy and better predict patient outcomes in heart failure assessment.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian approach that integrates human intuition with machine data for more precise LVEF estimates, enhancing outcome prediction.
Findings
Reduced measurement errors in LVEF estimates
Stronger association between LVEF and clinical outcomes
Improved predictive accuracy for patient prognosis
Abstract
The cardiologist's main tool for measuring systolic heart failure is left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Trained cardiologist's report both a visual and machine-guided measurement of LVEF, but only use this machine-guided measurement in analysis. We use a Bayesian technique to combine visual and machine-guided estimates from the PARTNER-IIA Trial, a cohort of patients with aortic stenosis at moderate risk treated with bioprosthetic aortic valves, and find our combined estimate reduces measurement errors and improves the association between LVEF and a 1-year composite endpoint.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments · Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors · Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
