Magnetic fields in star forming systems (I): Idealized synthetic signatures of dust polarization and Zeeman splitting in filaments
Stefan Reissl, Amelia M. Stutz, Robert Brauer, Eric W. Pellegrini,, Dominik R.G. Schleicher, Ralf Klessen

TL;DR
This study uses radiative transfer simulations to explore how combined dust polarization and Zeeman splitting observations can better constrain the three-dimensional magnetic field structures in star-forming filaments.
Contribution
It demonstrates that integrating dust polarization with Zeeman measurements resolves ambiguities in magnetic field morphology and provides more accurate field strength estimates.
Findings
Dust polarization alone cannot determine 3D magnetic field structure.
Zeeman measurements help resolve polarization ambiguities.
Zeeman-derived field strengths are underestimated due to line-of-sight averaging.
Abstract
We use the POLARIS radiative transport code to generate predictions of the two main observables directly sensitive to the magnetic field morphology and strength in filaments: dust polarization and gas Zeeman line splitting. We simulate generic gas filaments with power-law density profiles assuming two density-field strength dependencies, six different filament inclinations, and nine distinct magnetic field morphologies, including helical, toroidal, and warped magnetic field geometries. We present idealized spatially resolved dust polarization and Zeeman-derived field strengths and directions maps. Under the assumption that dust grains are aligned by radiative torques (RATs), dust polarization traces the projected plane-of-the-sky magnetic field morphology. Zeeman line splitting delivers simultaneously the intensity-weighted line-of-sight field strength and direction. We show that linear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
