Anatomy of Eddington-like inversion methods in the context of dark matter searches
Thomas Lacroix, Martin Stref, Julien Lavalle

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Eddington inversion methods for modeling dark matter velocity distributions in the Milky Way, identifying theoretical inconsistencies and proposing solutions to improve their applicability in dark matter searches.
Contribution
It analyzes the limitations of traditional Eddington inversion methods, especially regarding boundary conditions and anisotropy, and offers consistent approaches for their application in Galactic dark matter modeling.
Findings
Neglecting the DM halo boundary causes inconsistencies.
Realistic halo configurations can lead to ill-defined distribution functions.
Proposed solutions improve the theoretical consistency of inversion methods.
Abstract
Irrespective of the dark matter (DM) candidate, several potentially observable signatures derive from the velocity distribution of DM in halos, in particular in the Milky Way (MW) halo. Examples include direct searches for weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs), -wave suppressed or Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation signals, microlensing events of primordial black holes (PBHs), {\em etc}. Most current predictions are based on the Maxwellian approximation which is not only theoretically inconsistent in bounded systems, but also not supported by cosmological simulations. A more consistent method sometimes used in calculations for direct WIMP searches relies on the so-called Eddington inversion method, which relates the DM phase-space distribution function (DF) to its mass density profile and the total gravitational potential of the system. Originally built upon the isotropy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
