Treewidth, crushing, and hyperbolic volume
Cl\'ement Maria, Jessica S. Purcell

TL;DR
This paper establishes a linear relationship between the volume of hyperbolic 3-manifolds and their triangulation treewidth, while also showing that bounded treewidth does not imply bounded volume, with implications for 3-manifold topology.
Contribution
It proves a universal bound relating hyperbolic volume and triangulation treewidth and demonstrates that bounded treewidth does not constrain volume growth, introducing new techniques involving normal surface crushing.
Findings
Existence of a universal constant c relating volume and treewidth.
Bounded treewidth does not imply bounded volume in hyperbolic 3-manifolds.
Crushing normal surfaces does not increase carving-width, affecting treewidth by a constant.
Abstract
We prove that there exists a universal constant such that any closed hyperbolic 3-manifold admits a triangulation of treewidth at most times its volume. The converse is not true: we show there exists a sequence of hyperbolic 3-manifolds of bounded treewidth but volume approaching infinity. Along the way, we prove that crushing a normal surface in a triangulation does not increase the carving-width, and hence crushing any number of normal surfaces in a triangulation affects treewidth by at most a constant multiple.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
