Distributed Monitoring of Election Winners
Arnold Filtser, Nimrod Talmon

TL;DR
This paper develops communication-efficient distributed protocols for maintaining approximate election winners across various voting rules, enabling quick, high-probability winner identification with minimal communication.
Contribution
It introduces novel protocols that achieve logarithmic communication complexity for maintaining approximate winners in distributed elections, along with matching lower bounds.
Findings
Protocols operate with logarithmic communication in the number of voters.
Center can identify approximate winners with high probability at any time.
Lower bounds establish the optimality of the proposed protocols.
Abstract
We consider distributed elections, where there is a center and sites. In such distributed elections, each voter has preferences over some set of candidates, and each voter is assigned to exactly one site such that each site is aware only of the voters assigned to it. The center is able to directly communicate with all sites. We are interested in designing communication-efficient protocols, allowing the center to maintain a candidate which, with arbitrarily high probability, is guaranteed to be a winner, or at least close to being a winner. We consider various single-winner voting rules, such as variants of Approval voting and scoring rules, tournament-based voting rules, and several round-based voting rules. For the voting rules we consider, we show that, using communication which is logarithmic in the number of voters, it is possible for the center to maintain such approximate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
