
TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of $k$-integration to measure equality of opportunity in social networks, analyzing how network structure affects access to opportunities and proposing methods to achieve $k$-integration efficiently.
Contribution
It defines $k$-integration as a new measure of opportunity equality and provides formulas for the minimum number of bridges needed to achieve it in social networks.
Findings
Minimum bridges depend linearly on component size for $k=2$.
For $k \,\geq\, 3$, the minimum number of bridges is independent of component size.
The approach offers a simple way to compare social network equality.
Abstract
We propose the notion of -integration as a measure of equality of opportunity in social networks. A social network is -integrated if there is a path of length at most between any two individuals, thus guaranteeing that everybody has the same network opportunities to find a job, a romantic partner, or valuable information. We compute the minimum number of bridges (i.e. edges between nodes belonging to different components) or central nodes (those which are endpoints to a bridge) required to ensure -integration. The answer depends only linearly on the size of each component for , and does not depend on the size of each component for . Our findings provide a simple and intuitive way to compare the equality of opportunity of real-life social networks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
