Approximate Minimum Selection with Unreliable Comparisons in Optimal Expected Time
Stefano Leucci, Chih-Hung Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces an optimal randomized algorithm for approximate minimum selection in unreliable comparison settings, achieving expected time complexity close to the fault-free case and establishing tight lower bounds.
Contribution
It presents the first asymptotically optimal randomized algorithm for approximate minimum selection with unreliable comparisons, matching lower bounds and handling a broad range of parameters.
Findings
Algorithm achieves expected time O((n/k) log(1/q))
Lower bounds show no algorithm can do better in expectation
Optimal worst-case time is achievable for certain k values
Abstract
We consider the \emph{approximate minimum selection} problem in presence of \emph{independent random comparison faults}. This problem asks to select one of the smallest elements in a linearly-ordered collection of elements by only performing \emph{unreliable} pairwise comparisons: whenever two elements are compared, there is a constant probability that the wrong answer is returned. We design a randomized algorithm that solves this problem with probability and for the whole range of values of using expected time. Then, we prove that the expected running time of any algorithm that succeeds w.h.p. must be , thus implying that our algorithm is asymptotically optimal, in expectation. These results are quite surprising in the sense that for between …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Optimization and Search Problems
