Two theorems about the P versus NP problem
Tianheng Tsui

TL;DR
This paper presents two theorems related to the P versus NP problem, showing independence results and limitations of proof within ZFC and for polynomial-time Turing machines.
Contribution
It introduces new theoretical results demonstrating independence and unprovability aspects related to P versus NP within formal systems.
Findings
Existence of a language independent of ZFC for P membership
Existence of an NP language undecidable by any polynomial-time Turing machine
Highlights limitations of formal proof systems in resolving P vs NP
Abstract
Two theorems about the P versus NP problem be proved in this article (1) There exists a language , that the statement is independent of ZFC. (2) There exists a language , for any polynomial time deterministic Turing machine , we cannot prove is decidable on .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · Cellular Automata and Applications
