
TL;DR
This paper generalizes the correspondence between oplax functors and comonads from terminal bicategories to a broader class called generic bicategories, simplifying their description and applying it to well-known bicategories.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of generic bicategories and shows how oplax functors can be described similarly to comonads without involving composition directly.
Findings
Generalization of the oplax functor-comonad correspondence to generic bicategories.
Simplified description of oplax functors in terms of comonad-like data.
Application to bicategories of spans, polynomials, and cartesian monoidal categories.
Abstract
It is well known that to give an oplax functor of bicategories is to give a comonad in . Here we generalize this fact, replacing the terminal bicategory by any bicategory for which the composition functor admits generic factorisations. We call bicategories with this property generic, and show that for generic bicategories one may express the data of an oplax functor much like the data of a comonad; the main advantage of this description being that it does not directly involve composition in . We then go on to apply this result to some well known bicategories, such as cartesian monoidal categories (seen as one object bicategories), bicategories of spans, and bicategories of polynomials with cartesian 2-cells.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
