Solving a Conjecture on Identification in Hamming Graphs
Ville Junnila, Tero Laihonen, Tuomo Lehtil\"a

TL;DR
This paper advances the understanding of identifying codes in Hamming graphs by disproving a conjecture, improving bounds, and introducing new techniques involving designs and linear codes.
Contribution
It disproves the conjecture that mma^{ID}(K_q^3)=q^2, and introduces novel bounds and methods using designs and linear codes for identifying codes.
Findings
Disproved the conjecture mma^{ID}(K_q^3)=q^2.
Improved lower bound to mma^{ID}(K_q^3) q^2 - rac{3}{2} q.
Extended bounds for mma^{ID}(K_q^n) using linear and self-locating-dominating codes.
Abstract
Identifying codes in graphs have been widely studied since their introduction by Karpovsky, Chakrabarty and Levitin in 1998. In particular, there are a lot of results regarding the binary hypercubes, that is, the Hamming graphs . In 2008, Gravier et al. started investigating identification in . Goddard and Wash, in 2013, studied identifying codes in the general Hamming graphs . They stated, for instance, that for any and . Moreover, they conjectured that . In this article, we show that when is a power of four, disproving the conjecture. Our approach is based on the recursive use of suitable designs. Goddard and Wash also gave the following lower bound . We improve this bound to . The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoding theory and cryptography · Cooperative Communication and Network Coding · graph theory and CDMA systems
