Improved decoding of Folded Reed-Solomon and Multiplicity Codes

TL;DR

This paper improves the understanding of error-correcting capabilities of folded Reed-Solomon and multiplicity codes, achieving constant list sizes in list-decoding and local list-decoding, thus enhancing their practical utility.

Contribution

It demonstrates that folded Reed-Solomon and multiplicity codes can achieve list-decoding capacity with constant list sizes, surpassing previous polynomial bounds, and introduces capacity-achieving locally list-decodable codes.

Findings

Folded Reed-Solomon codes achieve list-decoding capacity with constant list sizes.

Univariate multiplicity codes can be list-recovered with constant list sizes.

Multivariate multiplicity codes are high-rate, locally list-recoverable codes.

Abstract

In this work, we show new and improved error-correcting properties of folded Reed-Solomon codes and multiplicity codes. Both of these families of codes are based on polynomials over finite fields, and both have been the sources of recent advances in coding theory. Folded Reed-Solomon codes were the first explicit constructions of codes known to achieve list-decoding capacity; multivariate multiplicity codes were the first constructions of high-rate locally correctable codes; and univariate multiplicity codes are also known to achieve list-decoding capacity. However, previous analyses of the error-correction properties of these codes did not yield optimal results. In particular, in the list-decoding setting, the guarantees on the list-sizes were polynomial in the block length, rather than constant; and for multivariate multiplicity codes, local list-decoding algorithms could not go beyond the Johnson bound. In this paper, we show that Folded Reed-Solomon codes and multiplicity codes are in fact better than previously known in the context of list-decoding and local list-decoding. More precisely, we first show that Folded RS codes achieve list-decoding capacity with constant list sizes, independent of the block length; and that high-rate univariate multiplicity codes can also be list-recovered with constant list sizes. Using our result on univariate multiplicity codes, we show that multivariate multiplicity codes are high-rate, locally list-recoverable codes. Finally, we show how to combine the above results with standard tools to obtain capacity achieving locally list decodable codes with query complexity significantly lower than was known before.