Consequence-based Reasoning for Description Logics with Disjunction, Inverse Roles, Number Restrictions, and Nominals
David Tena Cucala, Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ian Horrocks

TL;DR
This paper introduces a consequence-based reasoning calculus for complex description logics like ALCHOIQ and SROIQ, enabling efficient concept subsumption and classification with a pay-as-you-go approach.
Contribution
It presents a novel consequence-based calculus that is worst-case optimal for key fragments of ALCHOIQ, extending to SROIQ, with a flexible, incremental reasoning strategy.
Findings
Achieves worst-case optimality for important logic fragments
Extends to SROIQ, covering OWL 2 DL features
Offers a pay-as-you-go reasoning approach
Abstract
We present a consequence-based calculus for concept subsumption and classification in the description logic ALCHOIQ, which extends ALC with role hierarchies, inverse roles, number restrictions, and nominals. By using standard transformations, our calculus extends to SROIQ, which covers all of OWL 2 DL except for datatypes. A key feature of our calculus is its pay-as-you-go behaviour: unlike existing algorithms, our calculus is worst-case optimal for all the well-known proper fragments of ALCHOIQ, albeit not for the full logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
