Multi-Source Fusion Operations in Subjective Logic
Rens Wouter van der Heijden, Henning Kopp, Frank Kargl

TL;DR
This paper extends subjective logic to define multi-source fusion operations for various fusion operators, ensuring they are associative and well-defined, thus broadening the applicability of subjective logic in multi-actor scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces new definitions for multi-source fusion in subjective logic, including weighted belief fusion and consensus & compromise fusion, and corrects previous fusion operator results.
Findings
Multi-source fusion is now well-defined for all subjective logic operators.
The new fusion definitions are equivalent to intuitive formulations and produce valid opinions.
The work broadens the applicability of subjective logic in multi-actor systems.
Abstract
The purpose of multi-source fusion is to combine information from more than two evidence sources, or subjective opinions from multiple actors. For subjective logic, a number of different fusion operators have been proposed, each matching a fusion scenario with different assumptions. However, not all of these operators are associative, and therefore multi-source fusion is not well-defined for these settings. In this paper, we address this challenge, and define multi-source fusion for weighted belief fusion (WBF) and consensus & compromise fusion (CCF). For WBF, we show the definition to be equivalent to the intuitive formulation under the bijective mapping between subjective logic and Dirichlet evidence PDFs. For CCF, since there is no independent generalization, we show that the resulting multi-source fusion produces valid opinions, and explain why our generalization is sound. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
