
TL;DR
This paper establishes the small-is-very-small principle for restricted sequential theories, showing that small witnesses imply very small witnesses, with various consequences for theory extensions, models, and interpretability.
Contribution
It introduces the small-is-very-small principle for restricted sequential theories and explores its implications for theory extensions, models, and interpretability.
Findings
Every restricted, recursively enumerable sequential theory has a finitely axiomatized conservative extension.
Every sequential model has an extension where the intersection of all definable cuts is the natural numbers.
Reflection holds for $\
Abstract
The central result of this paper is the small-is-very-small principle for restricted sequential theories. The principle says roughly that whenever the given theory shows that a property has a small witness, i.e. a witness in every definable cut, then it shows that the property has a very small witness: i.e. a witness below a given standard number. We draw various consequences from the central result. For example (in rough formulations): (i) Every restricted, recursively enumerable sequential theory has a finitely axiomatized extension that is conservative w.r.t. formulas of complexity . (ii) Every sequential model has, for any , an extension that is elementary for formulas of complexity , in which the intersection of all definable cuts is the natural numbers. (iii) We have reflection for -sentences with sufficiently small witness in any consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
