Ab initio investigation of impurity-induced in-gap states in Bi$_2$Te$_3$ and Bi$_2$Se$_3$
Juba Bouaziz, Manuel dos Santos Dias, Julen Iba\~nez-Azpiroz, Samir, Lounis

TL;DR
This study combines first-principles calculations and an Anderson impurity model to show that impurity-induced in-gap states in Bi$_2$Te$_3$ and Bi$_2$Se$_3$ originate from hybridization with bulk bands, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It reveals that in-gap states from transition metal impurities in topological insulators come from bulk band hybridization, not surface states, providing new insights into magnetic doping effects.
Findings
In-gap states originate from bulk band hybridization.
Impurity states are not primarily from topological surface states.
Contradicts previous models attributing in-gap states to surface state hybridization.
Abstract
We investigate in-gap states emerging when a single transition metal impurity is embedded in topological insulators (BiTe and BiSe). We use a combined approach relying on first-principles calculations and an Anderson impurity model. By computing the local density of states of Cr, Mn, Fe and Co embedded not only in surfaces of BiTe and of BiSe but also in their bulk phases, we demonstrate that in-gap states originate from the hybridization of the electronic states of the impurity with bulk bands and not with the topological surface states as it is usually assumed. This finding is analyzed using a simplified Anderson impurity model. These observations are in contradiction with the prevailing models used to investigate the magnetic doping of topological insulators [R. R. Biswas et al. PRB 81, 233405 (2010), A. M. Black-Schafer et al. PRB 91, 201411…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
