Spectroscopic Validation of Low-Metallicity Stars from RAVE
Vinicius M. Placco, Timothy C. Beers, Rafael M. Santucci, Julio, Chaname, Maria Paz Sepulveda, Johanna Coronado, Sean D. Points, Catherine C., Kaleida, Silvia Rossi, Georges Kordopatis, Young Sun Lee, Gal Matijevic, Anna, Frebel, Terese T. Hansen, Erika M. Holmbeck

TL;DR
This study spectroscopically confirms the metallicity and chemical properties of 1,694 RAVE star candidates, identifying numerous CEMP stars and demonstrating the effectiveness of Gaia data in selecting low-metallicity stars.
Contribution
It provides a large, spectroscopically validated sample of low-metallicity stars, including detailed carbon and alpha-element abundances, and introduces Gaia-based criteria for candidate selection.
Findings
88% of stars have [Fe/H] <= -1.0
306 CEMP star candidates identified
Gaia transverse velocities aid in low-metallicity selection
Abstract
We present results from a medium-resolution (R ~ 2, 000) spectroscopic follow-up campaign of 1,694 bright (V < 13.5), very metal-poor star candidates from the RAdial Velocity Experiment (RAVE). Initial selection of the low-metallicity targets was based on the stellar parameters published in RAVE Data Releases 4 and 5. Follow-up was accomplished with the Gemini-N and Gemini-S, the ESO/NTT, the KPNO/Mayall, and the SOAR telescopes. The wavelength coverage for most of the observed spectra allows for the determination of carbon and {\alpha}-element abundances, which are crucial for con- sidering the nature and frequency of the carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars in this sample. We find that 88% of the observed stars have [Fe/H] <= -1.0, 61% have [Fe/H] <= -2.0, and 3% have [Fe/H] <= -3.0 (with four stars at [Fe/H] <= -3.5). There are 306 CEMP star candidates in this sample, and we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
