Correction of near-infrared high-resolution spectra for telluric absorption at 0.90-1.35 microns
Hiroaki Sameshima, Noriyuki Matsunaga, Naoto Kobayashi, Hideyo, Kawakita, Satoshi Hamano, Yuji Ikeda, Sohei Kondo, Kei Fukue, Daisuke, Taniguchi, Misaki Mizumoto, Akira Arai, Shogo Otsubo, Keiichi Takenaka, Ayaka, Watase, Akira Asano, Chikako Yasui, Natsuko Izumi

TL;DR
This paper presents a method for correcting near-infrared high-resolution spectra for telluric absorption using standard stars, achieving better than 2% accuracy under specific observational conditions.
Contribution
The authors introduce a novel telluric correction technique utilizing a synthetic telluric spectrum and demonstrate its effectiveness on feature-rich objects with blended lines.
Findings
Achieves better than 2% correction accuracy in low transmittance regions.
Effective even for spectra with heavily blended stellar and telluric lines.
Time and airmass matching are crucial for optimal correction accuracy.
Abstract
We report a method of correcting a near-infrared (0.90-1.35 m) high-resolution () spectrum for telluric absorption using the corresponding spectrum of a telluric standard star. The proposed method uses an A0\,V star or its analog as a standard star from which on the order of 100 intrinsic stellar lines are carefully removed with the help of a reference synthetic telluric spectrum. We find that this method can also be applied to feature-rich objects having spectra with heavily blended intrinsic stellar and telluric lines and present an application to a G-type giant using this approach. We also develop a new diagnostic method for evaluating the accuracy of telluric correction and use it to demonstrate that our method achieves an accuracy better than 2\% for spectral parts for which the atmospheric transmittance is as low as 20\% if telluric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
