Evaluating Tests of Virialization and Substructure Using Galaxy Clusters in the ORELSE Survey
N. Rumbaugh, B.C. Lemaux, A.R. Tomczak, L. Shen, D. Pelliccia, L.M., Lubin, D.D. Kocevski, P.-F. Wu, R.R. Gal, S. Mei, C.D. Fassnacht, and G.K., Squires

TL;DR
This study assesses various indicators of galaxy cluster virialization using multi-wavelength data from the ORELSE survey, identifying robust proxies for dynamical state when X-ray data is limited.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive comparison of virialization indicators, highlighting the effectiveness of centroid offsets and brightest galaxy positions as proxies.
Findings
Centroid offsets strongly correlate with virialization state.
X-ray and optical indicators show significant offsets in disturbed clusters.
Robust virialization proxies can be identified without deep X-ray data.
Abstract
We evaluated the effectiveness of different indicators of cluster virialization using 12 large-scale structures in the ORELSE survey spanning from . We located diffuse X-ray emission from 16 galaxy clusters using Chandra observations. We studied the properties of these clusters and their members, using Chandra data in conjunction with optical and near-IR imaging and spectroscopy. We measured X-ray luminosities and gas temperatures of each cluster, as well as velocity dispersions of their member galaxies. We compared these results to scaling relations derived from virialized clusters, finding significant offsets of up to 3-4 for some clusters, which could indicate they are disturbed or still forming. We explored if other properties of the clusters correlated with these offsets by performing a set of tests of virialization and substructure on our sample, including…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
