Exploring the Accuracy of MIRT Scale Linking Procedures for Mixed-format Tests
Zhen Li, Haiqin Chen, Tianli Li

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of Stocking-Lord scale linking procedures for mixed-format tests using UIRT and MIRT models under different anchor conditions and format effects, providing practical recommendations.
Contribution
It offers a comparative analysis of scale linking accuracy for UIRT and MIRT models with various anchor scenarios and format effects in mixed-format tests.
Findings
Stocking-Lord procedures vary in accuracy depending on anchor conditions.
MIRT models perform better under certain format effect conditions.
Recommendations for choosing linking procedures based on test design.
Abstract
This study investigates the accuracy of Stocking-Lord scale linking procedures for UIRT and MIRT models with common-item nonequivalent-group design for mixed-format tests under two anchor conditions: MC-Only and MC-CR across three different levels of format effects (FEs). Results provide recommendations on the appropriateness of UIRT and two MIRT models when FEs present under each anchor scenario.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
