The effect of cosmic-ray acceleration on supernova blast wave dynamics
M. Pais (1), C. Pfrommer (1), K. Ehlert (1), and R. Pakmor (2) ((1), Leibniz-Institut f\"ur Astrophysik Potsdam, Germany, (2) Heidelberger, Institut f\"ur Theoretische Studien, Germany)

TL;DR
This study models how cosmic-ray acceleration influences supernova blast wave shapes and dynamics, revealing that magnetic field orientation and turbulence significantly affect acceleration efficiency and shock morphology.
Contribution
It introduces a spherically expanding blast wave model incorporating obliquity-dependent cosmic-ray acceleration, linking magnetic field configurations to shock evolution and efficiency.
Findings
Oblate shock shape due to magnetic field orientation.
Self-similar blast wave evolution with constant ellipticity.
Average cosmic-ray acceleration efficiency around 5%.
Abstract
Non-relativistic shocks accelerate ions to highly relativistic energies provided that the orientation of the magnetic field is closely aligned with the shock normal (quasi-parallel shock configuration). In contrast, quasi-perpendicular shocks do not efficiently accelerate ions. We model this obliquity-dependent acceleration process in a spherically expanding blast wave setup with the moving-mesh code {\sc arepo} for different magnetic field morphologies, ranging from homogeneous to turbulent configurations. A Sedov-Taylor explosion in a homogeneous magnetic field generates an oblate ellipsoidal shock surface due to the slower propagating blast wave in the direction of the magnetic field. This is because of the efficient cosmic ray (CR) production in the quasi-parallel polar cap regions, which softens the equation of state and increases the compressibility of the post-shock gas. We find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
