Implementation of Artifact Detection in Critical Care: A Methodological Review
Shermeen Nizami, James R. Green, and Carolyn McGregor

TL;DR
This review analyzes over 80 artifact detection algorithms in critical care, highlighting their limitations and proposing standardized interfaces to enhance reusability, validation, and real-time clinical integration.
Contribution
It introduces a taxonomy for AD algorithms and provides recommendations for standardizing data interfaces to improve clinical applicability.
Findings
Most algorithms are specific to one CCU type
Limited validation across different OEM monitors
Few algorithms operate in real-time or are implemented clinically
Abstract
Artifact Detection (AD) techniques minimize the impact of artifacts on physiologic data acquired in Critical Care Units (CCU) by assessing quality of data prior to Clinical Event Detection (CED) and Parameter Derivation (PD). This methodological review introduces unique taxonomies to synthesize over 80 AD algorithms based on these six themes: (1) CCU; (2) Physiologic Data Source; (3) Harvested data; (4) Data Analysis; (5) Clinical Evaluation; and (6) Clinical Implementation. Review results show that most published algorithms: (a) are designed for one specific type of CCU; (b) are validated on data harvested only from one Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) monitor; (c) generate Signal Quality Indicators (SQI) that are not yet formalised for useful integration in clinical workflows; (d) operate either in standalone mode or coupled with CED or PD applications; (e) are rarely evaluated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
