Coherence, entanglement and quantumness in closed and open systems with conserved charge, with an application to many-body localisation
Katarzyna Macieszczak, Emanuele Levi, Tommaso Macr\`i, Igor, Lesanovsky, Juan P. Garrahan

TL;DR
This paper establishes a direct link between quantum coherence and entanglement in systems with conserved charge, providing practical bounds and methods to detect many-body localization and quantum phases without full state tomography.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to quantify and witness multipartite and bipartite entanglement through coherence and asymmetry in systems with fixed charge, applicable to open and closed quantum systems.
Findings
Quantum coherence can faithfully witness multipartite entanglement.
Bounds on entanglement are expressed as closed formulas in terms of coherence.
Method detects breaking of entanglement area law in 1D systems.
Abstract
While the scaling of entanglement in a quantum system can be used to distinguish many-body quantum phases, it is usually hard to quantify the amount of entanglement in mixed states of open quantum systems, while measuring entanglement experimentally, even for the closed systems, requires in general quantum state tomography. In this work we show how to remedy this situation in system with a fixed or conserved charge, e.g., density or magnetization, due to an emerging relation between quantum correlations and coherence. First, we show how, in these cases, the presence of multipartite entanglement or quantumness can be faithfully witnessed simply by detecting coherence in the quantum system, while bipartite entanglement or bipartite quantum discord are implied by asymmetry (block coherence) in the system. Second, we prove that the relation between quantum correlations and coherence is also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
