Non-thermal pressure support in X-COP galaxy clusters

TL;DR

This study measures non-thermal pressure support in galaxy clusters, finding it to be around 6-10%, which is lower than simulation predictions, impacting mass estimates and cosmological inferences.

Contribution

The paper provides high-quality hydrostatic mass measurements for 12 clusters, constrains non-thermal pressure support, and discusses implications for mass bias and cosmology.

Findings

Non-thermal pressure fraction is ~6% at R_500 and ~10% at R_200.

Hydrostatic masses require little correction, indicating low non-thermal support.

Results suggest a lower mass bias than some cosmological models assume.

Abstract

Galaxy clusters are the endpoints of structure formation and are continuously growing through the merging and accretion of smaller structures. Numerical simulations predict that a fraction of their energy content is not yet thermalized, mainly in the form of kinetic motions (turbulence, bulk motions). Measuring the level of non-thermal pressure support is necessary to understand the processes leading to the virialization of the gas within the potential well of the main halo and to calibrate the biases in hydrostatic mass estimates. We present high-quality measurements of hydrostatic masses and intracluster gas fraction out to the virial radius for a sample of 12 nearby clusters with available XMM-Newton and Planck data. We compare our hydrostatic gas fractions with the expected universal gas fraction to constrain the level of non-thermal pressure support. We find that hydrostatic masses require little correction and infer a median non-thermal pressure fraction of $\sim6\%$ and $\sim10\%$ at $R_{500}$ and $R_{200}$, respectively. Our values are lower than the expectations of hydrodynamical simulations, possibly implying a faster thermalization of the gas. If instead we use the mass calibration adopted by the Planck team, we find that the gas fraction of massive local systems implies a mass bias $1-b=0.85\pm0.05$ for SZ-derived masses, with some evidence for a mass-dependent bias. Conversely, the high bias required to match Planck CMB and cluster count cosmology is excluded by the data at high significance, unless the most massive halos are missing a substantial fraction of their baryons.