Testing the magnetar scenario for superluminous supernovae with circular polarimetry
Aleksandar Cikota, Giorgos Leloudas, Mattia Bulla, Cosimo Inserra,, Ting-Wan Chen, Jason Spyromilio, Ferdinando Patat, Zach Cano, Stefan Cikota,, Michael W. Coughlin, Erkki Kankare, Thomas B. Lowe, Justyn R. Maund, Armin, Rest, Stephen J. Smartt, Ken W. Smith

TL;DR
This study measured circular and linear polarization in two superluminous supernovae to test the magnetar powering scenario, finding no evidence of polarization but constraining magnetic field strength and symmetry of the explosion.
Contribution
First observational attempt to detect circular polarization in SLSNe-I to evaluate the magnetar model, providing upper limits and insights into magnetic field strength and geometry.
Findings
No circular polarization detected in either SLSN-I.
Linear polarization near peak was also not significant.
Magnetic field strength decreases rapidly with distance from the magnetar.
Abstract
Superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) are at least 5 times more luminous than common supernovae (SNe). Especially hydrogen-poor SLSN-I are difficult to explain with conventional powering mechanisms. One possible scenario that might explain such luminosities is that SLSNe-I are powered by an internal engine, such as a magnetar or an accreting black hole. Strong magnetic fields or collimated jets can circularly polarize light. In this work, we measured circular polarization of two SLSNe-I with the FOcal Reducer and low dispersion Spectrograph (FORS2) mounted at the ESO's Very Large Telescope (VLT). PS17bek, a fast evolving SLSN-I, was observed around peak, while OGLE16dmu, a slowly evolving SLSN-I, was observed 100 days after maximum. Neither SLSN shows evidence of circularly polarized light, however, these non-detections do not rule out the magnetar scenario as the powering engine for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
